Indeed git vs github confusion 
. Ye be warned, I doubt this is the last I’ll do.
There has been enough recent discussion around splitting the class library on this thread that it deserves its own thread:
If there’s a better way to redirect/move the discussion (or not at all), suggestions are welcome.
Would anyone like to do the same for the Quark System / Package Manager discussion? >> Quark Versioning / Dependency Management
2 Likes
In fact there’s a thread already : Quark Versioning / Dependency Management .
I restarted the topic here because I didn’t know this previous thread existed.
And it was an echo to Dyfer’s meeting feedback, which definitely has it’s place here.
1 Like
I am linking to a post in the hope that the following will be discussed at the next developer meeting. The post is not only about pitch classes and note names, but also about maintenance, I think. (At the moment, it is better to express my thoughts by post first and then complement them in a meeting.)