Schelp Style Guidelines discussion coordination thread

Development
7

I’ll just bump this thread now, as our aspirational deadline is approaching …
Again, the kinds of input I’m looking for are:

  1. “We should also be discussing [THING] while we’re at it”
  2. “The discussion of [THING] should probably take place in the X issue, not in the Y issue”
  3. “[THING] is really not worth our time, let’s just not mention it at all”

Just to make sure everyone who may have opinions is aware fo this, I am also tagging @julian, @dscheiba, @jordan, @jamshark70 and @smoge because they commented on one or more of prko’s original PR’s or forum threads that provided the original impetus behind this:
Time to have standard style to write help documentation?; Make SCDoc files consistent by prko · Pull Request #6622 · supercollider/supercollider · GitHub;
Various help documentation updates by prko · Pull Request #6534 · supercollider/supercollider · GitHub;

As well as @tedmoore of course as the other schelp-responsible person.

But that doesn’t mean I expect you all to comment here; just making sure you’re in the loop if you want to be.

3 Likes