How many ways can one define arguments for a function?

Resources Learning
1

In my work with the sclang tree-sitter grammar I have had to sit down and write syntactic rules / specs for sclang. This is a really fun exercise but it also makes me laugh out loud sometimes that I stumble on language features I had NEVER seen or heard of before - for example that you can define parameters with no commas in between list items if you use | for defining arguments or you can initialize parameters with parenthesis. Or that things like (:1..) select: _.isPrime nextN: 10; are actually fully valid expressions in sclang.

Anyways, I am curious if I have missed anything with regards to defining arguments in functions with and without initialization? See below

// No parameter init
{|a,b| (a+b).postln}.value(1,2)
{arg a,b; (a+b).postln}.value(1,2)

// No commas in between!?
{|a b| (a+b).postln}.value(1,2)

// With parameter initialization
{|a=1, b=2| (a+b).postln }.value
{|a(1), b(2)| (a+b).postln }.value

{arg a(1), b(2); (a+b).postln }.value
{arg a=1, b=2; (a+b).postln }.value
2

with param initialization no commas!

{|a=1 b=2| (a+b).postln}.value
{|a(1) b(2)| (a+b).postln}.value
3

|x 6 y 7 z 8| is true

4

who knew! that is the least typing for sure

5

Yeah I gotta hand it to one of the devs, who recently pointed out a few things among others…

Still, the documentation could be a little more organized, as far as keeping centralized sources that serve to explicity cite all existing forms of a certain alternative syntax implementation.

6

However… SC is the only place where the esoteric and ineffable actually add to the effect, in certain places… such as an abstract stream of lyrics, fragmented & enigmatic… one can still feel the depth beyond all that cannot be fully understood, and this adds a certain quality to the work, especially when this is paired with the musical result, it invokes a certain feeling… rare and profound is when the complexity and impossible add to such an experience, one quite rare and exclusive to SC .

Certain gems are buried in the documentation, elusive and rare, esoteric to a heavy extent, and if this is the exchange, for a rare form of experience that challenges clarity, exchanging it for levels deep of expressive complexity, I couldn’t say that everything isn’t how it should be, or that anything with any urgency must be changed…

Godspeed to all the devs here. Mad props, levels respect.

2 Likes