On the other hand, the domain is managed via OVH, which allows to set up an IAM management - so although I would own the domain, it would be possible for others to manage it as well. If one of the maintainers has an OVH account, I am happy to give them full access to the domain, allowing them to configure it to their liking.
With this access it is also possible to approve an outgoing transfer which transfers the ownership of a domain (IIUC).
In order to get things running I created a PR to move the official website to the proposed https://supercollider.online domain (currently the domain is not working b/c it is already setup to replace github.io address)
Feel free to discuss here or on GitHub any blockers, worries or support of this delicate action
Per the PR no hosting is required and the domain is already registered. So unless there is a compelling reason to move the registration from OFV I think this is ready to move forward.
That’s extremely generous. As there’s no hosting I’m guessing the costs would be low?
I can be one of the people with that access if that’s of use. Probably best to make sure it’s shared amongst at least a few until such time as a more general approach to SC ownership issues arises.
After seeing a small political party’s Instagram page being stolen by an ex-militant who left the party after a fight and rebranded the page to start his new journal, I realized that anything could happen.
Variations of such stories are numerous.
Therefore, we need a security protocol. And it should never depend on individuals but on protocols.
There may be a few uncontestable trusted users with an unparalleled level of trust: Scot Wilson, Julian Rohrhuber, James Harkins, Josh Parmenter, Alberto de Campo, etc, at least. The community trusts those individuals
It could be the first practical step into a “web of trust model” and the publication of their public keys online. Certain legal protections could be provided to protect the new site and any public “official” communication.