I am in the process of writing about my artistic research project soon to be published. The project revolves around my SC performance software which takes realtime midi- and audio input and turns a single-player performance into an orchestrated performance by adding chords, basslines, rhythms and fxs. I am tempted to describe it as either ‘sonification’ or ‘re-sonification’. I don’t know much about sonification but it seems the term is always used in connection with non-music-related datasets like dna strings, tracking of movement or whatever it might be.
Here is the first paragraph from the wiki entry on Sonification:
Sonification is the use of non-speech audio to convey information or perceptualize data. Auditory perception has advantages in temporal, spatial, amplitude, and frequency resolution that open possibilities as an alternative or complement to visualization techniques.
So by this definition, could you also consider the performance by humans of a piece of written music sonification? Could you consider the playback of a midiroll in DAW for sonification?
I am taking a dataset with one intended, or at lest ‘normal’ meaning and extracting a new layer of meaning based on rules arbitrarily set by me - some are quite intuitive, others not so much. The dataset is music-related to start with, but could I still call this sonification, possibly re-sonification? I do think the performance software perceptualize data, as it highlights and reacts to aspects of the performance, which might otherwise go unnoticed - a repeated sequence of pitches, a crescendo, a repeated sequence of accents, playing in certain subdivision etc.
Any input will be most welcome.